Spectator

WEB EXCLUSIVE: William Hague interview

Over at Spectator Live, our panellist Gaby Hinsliff asks who has the three qualities – momentum, hope and stamina – needed to close the deal in the last week of campaigning. After his exhausted blunder yesterday, Gordon Brown looks finished.   Also at Spectator Live, you can read an exclusive interview with William Hague, written by Hague’s biographer Jo-Anne Nadler. Hague has discovered a life outside politics, but if the Tories win Hague will serve as Foreign Secretary. It is the only job he wants. 

The killer poster

So, as Daniel Korski wrote earlier, a vote for Nick Clegg keeps Labour in office – surely fertile territory for a killer poster? Here’s a selection of CoffeeHousers’  ‘Vote Nick Get Gordon’ posters. Remember him? – Sam Davidson                          ——————————————————— Buy one, get one free – Disillusioned                           ——————————————————— Don’t get duped again – Hamish                           ——————————————————— Trusting Pinocchio, Jonathan                       ———————————————————— The Marriage of Convenience, John Macleod (Used by the SNP in the 2003 Scottish Parliament election, but one we hadn’t seen before)                       ——————————————————————- The Puppet Master, RKing                            ——————————————————— Share and share alike, Greg                               ——————————————————– Labour’s Last Hope, Ed Turnham                       

Covering the TV debate

We’ll be live-blogging tonight’s TV debate on Coffee House from 2030.  Do, please, join us then. And, in the meantime, over on our special election site Spectator Live, Spectator panellist Gaby Hinsliff has written about why she doesn’t think tonight’s debate will be a make or break moment.  And Reform’s Thomas Cawston has prepared a set of questions for the party leaders to answer.

How Charlie Whelan killed New Labour

Last summer, The Spectator received a letter from Charlie Whelan’s solicitors complaining about this post – where we mention their client’s spot of bother with his colleagues at Unite. Carter-Ruck were instructed on one of the no-win-no-fee deals: it cost Whelan nothing to sue, but could cost us £thousands to defend. So the lawyer’s letter is, by itself, an effective form of intimidation. A magazine with a small budget obviously faces huge pressure to do what he wanted: apologise, pay up and (suspiciously) undertake not to pursue the story any further. Under the circumstances, The Spectator could do only one thing. Our full investigation into Charlie Whelan is the cover story of tomorrow’s magazine

Just in case you missed them… | 12 April 2010

Spectator Live – the Spectator’s new election microsite – has had a busy weekend.  Click here to access the homepage.  Read new contributions from our panellists Gaby Hinsliff, Tim Montgomerie and Rory Sutherland.  Or check out our latest poll results. Here’s what happened across the rest of Spectator.co.uk: Fraser Nelson takes The Times to task over its coverage of the marriage tax break, and makes the case for voting Conservative. James Forsyth previews the candidates’ debate, and wonders if Blair’s respect for the office of Prime Minister will extend Cameron. Peter Hoskin analyses the Liberals’ and Labour’s response to the marriage tax, and finds Labour up to no good. David

What would you ask Cameron?

David Cameron takes a few journalists with him on each of his one-day tours, and it’s my turn tomorrow: 6am start. I should be able to get  half an hour or so with him, to do an interview for The Spectator. As is customary, I’ll try and ask him some questions on behalf of CoffeeHousers – so please add any thoughts as a comment below.

Spectator readers and professional pollsters predict a Tory majority

Underneath the IoS poll which David mentioned earlier there’s a set of election predictions from professional pollsters.  Differing margins of victory aside, seven-out-of-eight of them foresee a Tory majority in a few weeks time. I mention this not just because it’s worth, erm, mentioning – but because a poll of readers over at our new Spectator Live election site produced a similar result.  85 percent of you predict that the election will produce a Tory majority.  That’s very almost seven-out-of-eight. I promise I won’t ram Spectator Live down your collective throat every minute, but do check out the full results on this page here.  Or vote in our latest poll

Introducing Spectator Live | 9 April 2010

Just to flag up to CoffeeHousers that we’ve launched a separate area to the website: Spectator Live. Going to new.spectator.co.uk/live will open up what we hope will be your bulletin board for Election 2010. It collects all election-related content from around the Spectator website – so posts from Coffee House, from our team of bloggers, and the like. But there are also a few new bells and whistles. Here’s a quick guide to what you’ll find there: The Spectator Panel We’ve gathered a great selection of commentators from across the political spectrum to give their views on the unfolding campaign. They are: the journalist Gaby Hinsliff, ConservativeHome’s Tim Montgomerie, Left

Where the Mail’s cover story came from

It’s always gratifying to see Coffee House posts followed up in the newspapers, and I almost admire the way the Daily Mail has just splashed the newspaper on one of our posts without mentioning the source. CoffeeHousers will recognise the story on the Mail’s front page (left) – some 99 percent of jobs created since 1997 are accounted for by immigration. But the reader is left wondering where this figure came from. Was it released by the ONS? Erm, no. The only source for these figures is an email I was kindly sent by the ONS after specifically requesting the data. I used it in a line from The Spectator’s

Vaizey drops Cameron in it (again)

Michael Wolff’s portrait of David Cameron in the latest issue of Vanity Fair is well worth reading, even it it’s a weird kind of a beast. Wolff concludes – at the start of the piece, as it happens – that he’s “impressed” by the Tory leader. But then spends the best part of 2,000 words spraying out quotes and observations which will harden the attitudes of Cameron’s detractors, on both the left and the right. Cameron is a “toff”; Boris doubts his “intellectual bona fides”; the Tories have “anti-riffraff” policy on marriage, and so on. Wolff even quotes one Fraser Nelson, saying that he doesn’t “believe for a minute [Cameron]

Establishing free schools will be a difficult – but worthwhile – challenge

The small crowd of demonstrators from a group calling itself the Anti-Academies Alliance who gathered outside the Spectator conference on The Schools Revolution yesterday gave an indication of the opposition that Michael Gove and the Conservatives would face, were they to win the election and attempt the radical overhaul of which the British education system is so obviously in need. The thing that came across in our brief but passionate debate with the protestors was their opposition to independence, wherever it may raise its head in schools. Choice, to these people, is anathema. Undeterred, Gove’s speech majored on the virtues of independence. He criticised the present government for waging ‘a

Highlights from the latest Spectator | 4 March 2010

The latest issue of the Spectator is out today, and here are my top four features: 1. Britain on the brink.  Allister Heath, the editor of City AM, blogged about his cover story earlier. But the full article really is a must-read: it explains just why hung parliaments don’t work in Britain and why the AAA rating is now a red herring. There is a real risk of Britain following Greece into the vortex. 2. Why do we let South Africans play cricket for England? Peter Oborne cares deeply about cricket – and has written an impassioned piece about what he sees as a  South African invasion of our national

Facing the protesters

Given that school choice will only benefit those who cannot afford it at present, who could be against it? The answer is the Socialist Educational Alliance, who have decided to stage a protest at The Spectator’s conference on school liberalisation on Thursday. They have produced a leaflet (see left, and click to enlarge). “Bring your whistles and drums” it says – 8.30am. I wonder if Ed Balls will join them, as he appears to agree with the thrust of their argument. “Defend democratic accountability,” says the flier. This is the language which Labour left use: “democratic accountability” is code, of course, for political/bureaucratic control. Perhaps my friend Polly Toynbee will

Introducing Dave

Readers of the magazine will be familiar with Michael Heath’s series of ‘Flash Gordon’ cartoons, based on the life and sulks of our glorious Prime Minister.  Well, now it’s got a successor – ‘Dave’ – which, naturally enough, focuses on the Tory leader and would-be PM, Mr Cameron.  Here’s the first of them, from this week’s issue, for the benefit CoffeeHousers.  Just click on the image to make it bigger:

The changing face of English football

As Fraser said earlier, we’ve got a great piece by Mihir Bose in the latest issue of the mag on British football’s debt crisis.  I would normally say that non-football fans should look away now, but the story is so redolent of the entire financial crisis that it’s worth any CoffeeHouser’s time.  What you’ll find is a tale of big clubs, big egos and even bigger debts – the latter running into billions of pounds. Much of this debt has been down to financial brinkmanship on the part of football club owners and chairmen.  Even though money has been pouring into the English game from global television deals and the

Fraser Nelson

Highlights from the latest Spectator

The new issue of The Spectator is out today, and here are a few highlights. We’ve led on football, for once, with cover image by Mark Summers of David Beckham in the England away strip. Here are my top five features: 1. The very strange death of English Football. Mihir Bose, former BBC Sports Editor, has written about the weird paradox gripping the game: the Premiership is a global business, but half its clubs are insolvent. The cash is not only driving many of them (like Portsmouth) to the wall, but driving out English players. Just 17 percent of players who have appeared in this year’s Premiership are British under-25s.

In this week’s issue

The latest issue of the Spectator is published today. If you are a subscriber you can view it here. If you have not subscribed, but would like to view this week’s content, you can subscribe online here, or purchase a single issue here. A selection of articles have been made available, free, for all website users: Matt Ridley salutes the bloggers who changed the climate debate. James Forsyth warns that the Tories cannot continue to fight the election on a vague promise of “change”. Rod Liddle asks whether it’s racist to want an English-speaking cab driver. Deborah Ross reviews Clint Eastwood’s Mandela biopic, Invictus. And Jeremy Clarke relates a mysterious

What’s it all about, Dave?

This morning, I drove past one of the Cameron adverts – “I’ll cut the deficit, not the NHS” – and that Bacacharch & David song came into my head: “What’s it all about, Alfie?” It’s been in my head, in fact, ever since his Oxford speech last weekend. Just what is the Big Idea? We seek to answer the question in this week’s magazine with four pieces. James Forsyth says that any hunt for Cameron’s ideology will be in vain, because he doesn’t really have one. He doesn’t like –isms and there will never be a Cameronism. David Selbourne, one of Britain’s leading political philosophers, has written a scathing piece.

Here’s to a boozy New Year

Happy New Year – and have a drink! That’s the message from the new year issue of The Spectator, where Leah McLaren has written a superb piece answering the Liam Donaldsons of this world. Here she is, in full flow: “Almost all of this country’s most famous names been unapologetic boozers. From Kate Moss to Francis Bacon to Christopher Hitchens to the Queen Mum, Brits have a great tradition of not letting their functional alcoholism drag them down. Without it, arguably, we would not have punk rock, romantic poetry or basic democratic freedoms — for as Churchill urged us to remember, he ‘took more out of alcohol’ than alcohol took