Wikipedia’s harmful untruths
There was a time when Wikipedia felt like a miracle: a spontaneous, self-governing lexicon arising from the turbid chaos of the web. No editors kept gates, no gilded towers barred entrance, no one had power to impose a worldview, it was all done by thousands of neutral volunteers harvesting and serving the world’s knowledge, onto a digital platter. And their sheer numbers – it was hoped – would preserve accuracy and objectivity. The same way a crowd has more wisdom than the individual.However, as the years pass, that illusion of noble neutrality has shattered. And a clear and maybe terminal tilt to the left has revealed itself. As Wiki-founder Larry Sanger lamented in a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, the Wikipedia he wanted has long gone.