Politics

Read about the latest UK political news, views and analysis.

Friday

4 Jul 2025

How the Home Office created the Boriswave

The Home Office opened Britain’s doors to record numbers of migrants without properly assessing the risks or consequences, according to a damning new report from parliament’s Public Accounts Committee. The report, released overnight, finds that the department ‘made changes to the Skilled Worker Visa route without a full assessment of the risks or potential impacts, including the risks of non-compliance with visa rules and exploitation of migrant workers.’ The Tories turned on the immigration tap without asking what would happen when these workers’ visas expired – or what they would do while they were here In other words, the Tories turned on the immigration tap without asking what would happen

John Power

Ipso owes Suella Braverman an apology

When Suella Braverman wrote in April 2023 that ‘the perpetrators [of group-based child sexual exploitation] are groups of men, almost all British-Pakistani,’ the then-Home Secretary was roundly condemned. ‘Hacked Off’, a lobby group which seeks to tighten regulation of the press, said her article in the Mail on Sunday was part of a ‘toxic libel’. Guardian columnist Owen Jones went on to describe her ‘claims’ as ‘designed to foment racist division and hate’. Lewis Goodall of LBC confronted her live on air, saying that she was chastised ‘entirely rightly’ for her ‘false claim’. Last week, Suella Braverman wrote to Ipso to demand a retraction of that ruling. She is right to do so One entity

Philip Patrick

Will China interfere in choosing the next Dalai Lama?

Tenzin Gyatso, otherwise known as His Holiness the XIVth Dalai Lama, spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism, will celebrate his 90th birthday on Sunday. Despite once predicting he would live to 110, the Dalai Lama has perhaps prudently decided that the time is right to discuss his succession. He will host a conference of Lamas and luminaries (including the actor Richard Gere) to discuss the question. China, which annexed Tibet in 1959, causing the then young holy man to flee to India, will be following the preemptive Buddhist conclave with great interest. Whoever the next Dalai lama is will have large sandals to fill and is unlikely to be as charismatic

Matthew Lynn

Raising taxes would be a relief for Rachel Reeves

The Chancellor Rachel Reeves was in far better form when she appeared again in public alongside the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer yesterday. The tears have been wiped away and she has a smile, even if a slightly forced one, back on her face. The reason is not hard to work out. She has started preparing the ground for another round of big tax rises in the autumn. And that is the one thing she is good at. Reeves is back in her comfort zone. In the wake of the backbench rebellion that forced the government to abandon its welfare reforms, and with the U-turn on the winter fuel allowance,

Druin Burch

Wes Streeting has learnt nothing from the NHS’s past mistakes

Yesterday, Wes Streeting and Keir Starmer announced a ten-year plan to save the NHS. ‘There are moments in our national story when our choices define who are,’ Streeting explained. ‘Unless the NHS changes, the argument that it is unsustainable will grow more compelling. It really is change or bust. We choose change.’ One wonders whether he was tempted otherwise. Starmer says the plan will oversee ‘three fundamental shifts in how the NHS works’. First, care will move from hospitals to the community. Second, new technology will reduce admin and ‘make booking appointments and managing your care as easy as online banking or shopping’. Third, the NHS will shift its focus

Kristina Murkett

The biggest reason people aren’t having babies? FOMO

In his book Selfish Reasons To Have More Kids, economist Bryan Caplan notes that, due to modern conveniences and our better quality of life, parenting should be easier than ever. Plus, in theory, as society grows richer, people should have more children. Instead, we have fewer, and parenting seems harder than ever. Why is this? Caplan argues that it is because we have placed many new requirements and expectations on parents that previous generations never had. He contends that parenting has morphed into a suite of ever-changing, high-pressure social obligations – many of which are neurotic, consumerist and status-obsessed, such as saturating your child’s timetable with extracurricular activities to ensure that

Chas Newkey-Burden

Why Oasis is like Reform

Almost 16 years after they last performed live, Oasis kick off their reunion tour tonight and for every ‘mad for it’ fan, there’s someone else who thinks they’re a musical atrocity. The critics say they rip off other artists. There’s not much to debate about this. The intro of ‘Don’t Look Back In Anger’ is John Lennon’s ‘Imagine’, the opening riff on ‘Cigarettes and Alcohol’ is T Rex’s ‘Bang a Gong (Get It On)’, while ‘Step Out’s’ chorus is Stevie Wonder’s ‘Uptight’, to name just a few examples. There are countless more and Noel Gallagher makes no secret of how he writes songs. He told Q magazine in 1997 that he

Miriam Cates

Why the baby bust matters

Birth rates are tumbling across the world. This isn’t just a tragedy for the growing number of women who have fewer children than they want; below-replacement fertility rates mean that each generation will be smaller than the one before. This could lead to a permanent spiral of decline where the old always outnumber the young. But can anything be done about it? A report published last month by the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) acknowledges the problem, but its analysis is rather confused. The authors complain that economic barriers prevent women from having ‘reproductive agency’ while simultaneously arguing that governments trying to reduce these barriers are, in some cases, ‘coercive’. After decades

John Connolly

John Connolly, Gavin Mortimer, Dorian Lynskey, Steve Morris and Lloyd Evans

26 min listen

On this week’s Spectator Out Loud: John Connolly argues that Labour should look to Andy Burnham for inspiration (1:51); Gavin Mortimer asks if Britain is ready for France’s most controversial novel – Jean Raspail’s The Camp of the Saints (4:55); Dorian Lynskey looks at the race to build the first nuclear weapons, as he reviews Frank Close’s Destroyer of Worlds (11:23); Steve Morris provides his notes on postcards (16:44); and, Lloyd Evans reflects on British and Irish history as he travels around Dublin (20:44). Produced and presented by Patrick Gibbons.

Thursday

3 Jul 2025

Isabel Hardman

So much is still unanswered about NHS reform

Given we have known for a good while that Labour thinks the way to save the health service is to move care out of hospitals and into the community, you might have expected today’s NHS ten-year plan to explain how the government is going to do that. The preventive agenda is not a new idea that needs explaining, it’s been around for the entire 77-year history of the health service. The problem, therefore, is not the lack of an idea, it’s that reform never actually happens. The important and urgent priorities of waiting lists and emergency units always end up dominating, and the neighbourhood health centres, walk-in clinics, polyclinics or the ‘health

Oscar Edmondson

NHS reforms: Labour puts on a brave face

14 min listen

Today Wes Streeting – with the help of Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves – announced his 10 year plan for curing the NHS. It’s all about creating a ‘Neighbourhood Health Service’, but what does actually mean in practice? Much of the plan was leaked in advance: first, focusing on preventing disease before it becomes too late; second, improving community healthcare services to help reduce pressure on hospitals; and third, embracing the tech revolution to bring the NHS into the ‘digital age’. One of the glaring omissions is a chapter on how this will all be delivered. Perhaps the most notable part of today’s launch was the decision to include Rachel

Matthew Lynn

Do the markets care if Rachel Reeves stays or goes?

When the Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer gave his full backing to his Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the brief panic in the markets following her tearful performance in the House of Commons subsided. Gilt yields stopped rising, the pound clawed back some lost ground, and the markets recovered their nerve. It was easy to spin that as bond investors backing Reeves. But is that really true? The markets have seemingly already lost confidence in the Chancellor. They simply prefer stability to chaos, and they quite rightly fear that any of the plausible alternatives will prove even worse. Bond investors have already lost faith in the Chancellor ‘She will be the Chancellor

Lucy Dunn

Labour’s 10-year NHS plan is full of promise – and hurdles

Labour’s decision to launch its 10-year health plan at the Sir Ludwig Guttmann centre in Stratford this morning made sense as a bid to exemplify the unit’s multi-service approach. On health grounds, however, there seemed a real chance the presser might push up NHS waiting lists as spectators fought to remain conscious in the suffocating heat. It wasn’t just the fainting risk that was concerning attendees: the appearance of Rachel Reeves was a surprise after her teary PMQs session yesterday, with the Chancellor having to smile nonchalantly through countless variations of ‘are you alright?’. Labour needs to be in power for three terms to see its plans through Health Secretary

James Heale

Farage claims the mantle of Thatcher’s revolution

After a day of drama in Westminster, an intriguing party was hosted in the City. The Prosperity Institute, formerly Legatum, is not one of the more venerable think tanks, like the Fabians or the IEA. But the attendant crowd – a mix of centre-right wonks, spinners, thinkers and politicians – was a testament to the work that the institute has done since July 2024. A large marquee and well-stocked bar prompted one guest to remark that ‘It felt more of a wedding than a wake’. That was a refreshing sentiment for many attendees, given the tendency of such events to become mournful, dour affairs since the election. But it also

Stephen Daisley

Rachel Reeves, Winston Churchill and a short history of crying in politics

The scenes of a tearful Rachel Reeves are all anyone is likely to remember from yesterday’s Prime Minister’s Questions. The Chancellor wept openly, her expression distraught; it was difficult to watch. The death of Princess Diana and the extraordinary outpourings of public grief that followed marked the end of stiff-upper-lip Britain. Vestiges remain, however, and we still become uncomfortable at the sight of the prominent and powerful brought to tears. It triggers a Pavlovian response in much the same way that the mention of religion in polite company has our toes scrunching in our shoes, as we try to dig a hole to escape the awkwardness. The tearful politician has

Alec Marsh

Is it time to put Margaret Thatcher on our banknotes?

The Bank of England wants to rethink banknotes and has announced a public consultation in order to generate suggestions about what to put on them. ‘Banknotes are more than just an important means of payment,’ declares Victoria Cleland, the Bank’s chief cashier, whose signature is on notes. ‘They serve as a symbolic representation of our collective national identity and an opportunity to celebrate the UK.’ The ‘Maggie’ would become the go-to note. How better to celebrate a free-marketeer and our first woman prime minister? So, who should we put on our next banknotes? My vote, 35 years after she left office, would be to put Margaret Thatcher on the ten pound note.

William Moore

Claws out for Keir, Mamdani’s poisoned apple & are most wedding toasts awful?

46 min listen

This week: one year of Labour – the verdict In the magazine this week Tim Shipman declares his verdict on Keir Starmer’s Labour government as we approach the first anniversary of their election victory. One year on, some of Labour’s most notable policies have been completely changed – from the u-turn over winter fuel allowance to the embarrassing climb-down over welfare this week. Starmer has appeared more confident on the world stage but, for domestic audiences, this is small consolation when the public has perceived little change on the problems that have faced Britain for years. Can Starmer turn it around? Tim joined the podcast alongside the Spectator’s editor Michael

Matthew Parris

How Labour governments always end

Couldn’t we just skip to the end? I’m old enough to have seen this so often: must I sit through each dreary succeeding scene again? Parties in government are animals: they have natures; their natures do not change; they are incapable of being different animals; and what follows, follows. A Labour government finally runs out of money and enters a period of slow-motion disintegration, ending in a chaos of finger-pointing and blame-shifting, still whimpering about social justice as the bailiffs move in. Already the suspense has gone. There will be many twists and turns, probably over years rather than months, before this government pulls apart at the seams; but, honestly,

The Spectator

Portrait of the week: Welfare rebellions, Glastonbury chants and Lucy Letby arrests

Home Sir Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, in the face of a rebellion by 120 backbenchers over the welfare bill, undertook to limit to new claimants restrictions on personal independence payments (Pip). Modelling by the Department for Work and Pensions predicted that 150,000 people might be pushed into ‘relative poverty’ by the revised welfare cuts, compared with 250,000 before. Still fearing defeat, the government made more last-minute concessions, postponing changes to Pip rules until after a review by Sir Stephen Timms, the disability minister. The government then won the second reading by 335 to 260, with 49 Labour MPs voting against. It was not clear that the eviscerated bill would

Tim Shipman

Can Keir Starmer fend off Labour’s big beasts?

It was the chronicle of a death foretold. Last year Keir Starmer’s chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, drafted a memo for his boss spelling out in the starkest terms How Labour Could Fail. This week, instead of celebrating the first anniversary of Labour’s landslide election victory, the two men revisited that analysis and reflected on its prescience. McSweeney may be in the firing line of Labour backbenchers angry at Downing Street’s mishandling of welfare reform, but he was eerily accurate in predicting the problems that this administration would face. ‘The only task Labour finds harder than taking power from the Conservatives is keeping it,’ McSweeney warned. ‘Few Labour prime ministers