Federal judges crave the spotlight
In case after case, judges ruled to stymie the executive branch for one main reason
Read about the latest political news, views and analysis
In case after case, judges ruled to stymie the executive branch for one main reason
In Ukraine, peace will be a hard sell
These telegenic expat firebrands have begun to redefine the contours of the right
Four in ten women want to leave America. But where would they go?
To understand why boys are turning to Nick Fuentes, look inside our schools
There is a ‘small penis’ theory of history
The app has done more for the city’s social life than a decade of think-tank happy hours
Alex Vitale wrote ‘the problem is policing itself’
South Africa’s corruption and human rights abuses are deplorable
As Moscow and Washington prepare for talks on the latest version of Donald Trump’s peace plan, leaked recordings of a conversation with US envoy Steve Witkoff have thrown a spotlight on to senior diplomat Yuri Ushakov. It seems he, not Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, is the prime mover behind Russia’s negotiating position. The stature of Lavrov, once a legend in the diplomatic community, has steadily diminished since 2014, when he wasn’t even consulted before Vladimir Putin decided to annex Crimea. Every year since then, the now-75-year-old minister has petitioned Putin to be allowed to retire; every year this is denied. Instead, Lavrov remains confined to a role of repeating threadbare talking points
The killing of Lebanese Hezbollah military chief Haytham Ali Tababtabai by Israel this week reflects how much the balance of power between Jerusalem and the Iran-backed Shia Islamist group has shifted since the year-long war between the two in 2023 and 2024. Yet, paradoxically, Tabatabai’s killing also shows that nothing has been finally settled between the two enemies. While Hezbollah has now been shown to be much weaker than Israel, it nevertheless remains stronger than any internal faction in Lebanon, including the official Lebanese government. The practical consequence of this is escalation: Hezbollah is seeking to repair and rebuild its capacities, no force in Lebanon is willing or able to stop
The President’s top aide resigned after mounting pressure at home and abroad
Yesterday’s release of immigration figures by Britain’s Office of National Statistics didn’t make for particularly pleasant reading. While net migration had fallen to around 200,000 in the 12 months to June, much of this was down to an unusually high exodus of people, with 693,000 leaving the country over the same period. Many of those leaving were under the age of 30. That news, however, seemed to prompt something approaching gloating over at the New York Times, which published a piece yesterday headlined: “The British Public Thinks Immigration Is Up. It’s Actually Down, Sharply.” To labor the point, the piece was accompanied by a picture of anti-migration protestors in Scotland.
The imbroglio over the Ukraine peace deal has revealed some interesting tensions within the Trump administration
Whatever happened to Britain, or the UK, or England, or whatever they’re calling it? We can’t even agree on what it’s called. But what happened to England, the England that, if you’re over 50, you grew up learning about, the England that controlled the world, the England that ran the largest empire in human history at the end of World War One? Britain, which is an island in a pretty inhospitable climate, controlled literally a quarter of the Earth’s surface – and not controlled in the way the United States controls the rest of the world with an implied threat or with economic ties through trade, but with administrators and people sitting
Tucker Carlson has a favorite stage persona: the last sane man in the world, now at the end of his tether
How will Americans respond when the idea of ‘mass deportations’ ceases to be an abstraction, and instead comes knocking on the door?
His response had the rhetorical footprints of Stephen Miller
Proponents of regime change are throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks
Judge Currie’s order is an astonishing power-grab by the judicial branch