Politics

Read about the latest UK political news, views and analysis.

Entente cordiale

With Nicolas Sarkozy set to meet Gordon Brown later today, it’s well-worth reading Simon Heffer’s article in the Telegraph. He characterises the meeting as one between two beleaguered premiers who are desperate to prop each other up. But the major claim is that Brown’s “woken up” to his “errors over the Lisbon Treaty”, and is trying to tweak the diplomatic landscape accordingly. Here’s the relevant passage: “France in particular wants greater co-operation in defence and defence procurement. Britain is cautious, not because of any principled objections, but because Mr Brown has belatedly, and very privately, woken up enough to the extent of his errors over the Lisbon Treaty to realise

Freedom for schools

David Cameron and his front-benchers seem to be reeling off one impressive speech after another at the moment.  And today Michael Gove continued the run, with a key address on the inequalities which blight the British schools system.  It’s well-worth reading in full – for the revealing statistics and fizzy slogans – but Gove’s impassioned plea for school independence jumped out at me: “What allows [successsful] schools to operate in the way they do are structures which are truly liberal… …academies, and the city technology colleges which came before them and on which they were modelled, were designed to be free. Free to choose and shape their own curriculum. Free

Get your questions in

Today will be the last day for you to quiz Nick Clegg – so rush over to this post and register your questions in the comments section.  Tomorrow we’ll pick out the best ones and pose them to the Lib Dem leader. 

James Forsyth

The new Labour faultline

For the Kremlinologists among us, Rachel Sylvester’s column on the ideological divisions between the old Brownites and the new recruits in today’s Telegraph is essential reading:  “The ‘old Brownites’ – including Ed Balls, Damian McBride and Ian Austin – are Labour tribalists who think the way to victory is through class war. Personally, they are laddish, football-loving street fighters. Politically, they are ruthless in the way they operate, demanding absolute loyalty (to Mr Brown, rather than to Labour) in return for favours. Having honed their skills creating dividing lines with Tony Blair, now they want to fight a highly personal campaign against David Cameron, portraying him as an Old Etonian

Fraser Nelson

A direct hit

The Tory inflation report has splashed today’s Mail, got (another) p1 in the Telegraph, p2 lead in The Sun – the list goes on. A direct hit. Proof of Coulson’s nous, but also of Labour’s strikingly ineffective rebuttal mechanism. Most goods on the Tory list are cheaper, in real terms, than ten years ago. Other items, like instant coffee and bananas, are lower even in nominal prices. And where was the Labour person making this point? I may be reading too much into this. But with Balls running DCFS it seems Labour’s financial force field is down. Time, then, for the Tories to strike.

Just in case you missed them… | 25 March 2008

Here are some of the posts made over the Easter weekend: Nadine Dorries MP criticises the Embryology Bill. Fraser Nelson warns Team Cameron that the Government may outflank them on education reform. Peter Hoskin suggests that Britain will benefit from a new nuclear power agreement with the French. The Skimmer assesses the response of brain-dead liberals to David Mamet’s admission that he is no longer a “brain-dead liberal”. James Forsyth asks whether the new Brown team is compatible with the old one. And, over at Americano, James also investigates what’s next for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

Fraser Nelson

The cost of living under Brown

The Conservatives have today published one of the best pieces of research I have seen them do in some time – a “cost of living” report to coincide with David Cameron campaigning in London today. Following on from a spread in The Sun last week, it focuses on what inflationary pressure means to families. Butter: up 37%. Eggs: up 34%. Bread: up 28%. Milk: up 17%. All since Gordon Brown became Prime Minister. Can we blame Brown for such high inflation? Not really. But this blows a hole in his risible claims to be providing record low inflation.   With this research the Tories are brilliantly exploiting Del Brown’s addiction

Alex Massie

A Scots-Irish candidate for a Scots-Irish people?

Megan McArdle is surely right that Jamie Kirchik’s prediction that Massachusetts may vote Republican this November seems, shall we say, implausible. Kirchik suggests that: a Scots-Irish war veteran as the Republican nominee complicates predictions about whom Kennedy Country will support come November. Well, up to a point Lord Copper. As Megan says, “Irish” America is largely catholic, whereas the descendants of the Scots-Irish, er, are not. More to the point, not many of them live in New England. The Scots-Irish constituency, to the extent is still exists, is found in Tennessee, southern Virginia and the Carolinas. Still, in pointing out Kirchik’s mistake, Megan commits one of her own. It wasn’t

James Forsyth

Is the new Brown team compatible with the old one?

Gordon Brown’s new team at Number Ten have received rave reviews. Andrew Rawnsley in The Observer today points out how cabinet ministers who were in despair before Christmas have been given hope by the new Downing Street operation while Fraser has—in these pages—warned the Conservatives not to underestimate the new Brown machine. But this new Brown team can only work if it can come to an accommodation with the old Brown crew; something which Gaby Hinsliff’s masterful piece in today’s Observer suggests is some way off. If any of Brown’s new hires walk away before the election it will be seen as a sign that Brown is done for. As

Brain dead liberals

 The reaction from the liberal-left to David Mamet’s confession that he is no longer a “brain-dead liberal” has been strangely muted — and often hilariously ludicrous. The most priceless piece of bien pensant thinking comes, naturally, from Michael Billington, the Guardian’s tedious, right-on theatre critic.   “I am depressed to read that David Mamet has swung to the right,” says the poor dear. “What worries me is the effect on his talent of locking himself into a rigid ideological position.”   Let’s just unravel the massive self-regarding hypocrisy behind that statement. As long as Mamet was writing plays from Billington’s liberal-left perspective, he was a beacon of free-thinking insight and

Fraser Nelson

If Cameron isn’t careful, Brown will outflank him on education reform

The Spectator recently ran a letter from Lord Adonis saying the Swedish schools revolution which I said David Cameron would bring to Britain was in fact being delivered under Labour. Huh, I thought, keep telling yourself that – if it makes this whole Brown thing better for you. But today I picked up my local newspaper to find a striking splash: two City Academies run by Kunskapsskolan, the Swedish company I interviewed for my cover piece, are coming to my borough.   Things move quickly. Just last month Per Ledin, the head of Kunskapsskolan, was in his office asking me: “City Academies? What kind of a beast are those?” Now

Alex Massie

The Obama Curve

Charles Murray on Obama:   I understand how naïve it is to read a presidential candidate’s speech as if it were anything except political positioning, but that leads me to my final point: It’s about time that people who disagree with Obama’s politics recognize that he is genuinely different. When he talks, he sounds like a real human being, not a politician. I’m not referring to the speechifying, but to the way he comes across all the time. We’ve had lots of charming politicians. I cannot think of another politician in my lifetime who conveys so much sense of talking to individuals, and talking to them in ways that he

James Forsyth

The funding muddle

The issue of party funding is going to run and run with the parties still nowhere near an agreement on it. In an interview with the Telegraph today, Francis Maude makes an astonishing charge about the opaqueness of trade union funding for Labour: “It’s a racket, there are two unions which declare more members paying the political levy than they have members.” If Maude is right, then this is a huge scandal. The Tories, however, will never be on firm political ground on party funding while Lord Ashcroft’s tax status remains unclear. Maude tells the Telegraph he has “no idea” whether Ashcroft does pay tax in the UK and that

James Forsyth

The Tories should not let their caution on tax conceal the radicalism of their other policies

James Forsyth reviews the week in politics What a difference a poll lead makes. If Philip Hammond, the shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, had given an interview appearing to rule out tax cuts in a Conservative first term, when the Tories were behind in the polls or only marginally ahead, there would have been a full-scale revolt. To add fuel to the fire, Hammond talked about government storing up money in a ‘pot’ before giving it back — language which suggests that Hammond has forgotten whose money it is in the first place. But a YouGov poll showing the Tories with a 16-point lead which appeared on the same

Charles Moore

The miners’ strike and the fight against Islamism

The huge defeat of the Conservative party in the election of 1997 drove the party back into its rural and suburban redoubts and so cut it off from many things which were happening in Britain. It did not want to think about the rise of political Islam. This opting out was part of a wider demoralisation in conservative culture in recent years. In the time of the Millennium, the death of Diana and all that, many conservative-minded people started to say things like, ‘I don’t recognise my own country.’ They felt so alienated, particularly from their own cities, that they wanted to avoid thinking about problems of multiculturalism, and of

Alex Massie

Westminster and Whitehall dishonour Britain again

Need it be said that the treatment of the Gurkhas – by successive governments – is disgraceful and a harrowing indictment of the civil service and politicians alike? Have these fools no shame? Apparently not. They came in their Sunday best — a sea of tweeds, brogues and blazers with gold buttons — and mingled politely opposite the Houses of Parliament. There was a lot of hip-hooraying and handshaking. It was the most British of protests. But while the thousand retired Gurkhas who gathered in London yesterday were certainly British in heart and mind, theirs was a campaign to become British by law. Last March, the Government said that all

Alex Massie

New Labour’s Bankruptcy

If you doubted that Gordon Brown’s government is already exhausted, consider the nonsense being peddled by Stephen Carter, the former PR supremo brought in to salvage something – anything! – for Gordon. From Iain Martin’s column today: A couple of takes on Carter’s actions are being briefed: either a justified clear-out of the team that brought you the election-that-never-was, or another example of outside experts misunderstanding tribal Labour. Probably, it is a bit both. What is clear is that on Tuesday, in scenes redolent of The Office and David Brent, Carter divided up the Cabinet into “break-away” groups of six or seven, where they were given problems to solve –

James Forsyth

How McCain can help Cameron

It is a definite coup for David Cameron that John McCain saw him as well as Gordon Brown today. It was a significant statement that a President McCain expects to have to deal with both men when in office; he clearly expects Cameron to be PM before 2012. But McCain can help Cameron in policy terms too. Cameron has struggled to come up with an inspiring way to talk about his greenery, it can sound rather too doom and gloomy. McCain offers a solution to this problem. He talks inspiringly about how tackling climate change is going to create jobs not cost them, spur economic growth not constrict it and

Poetry Corner

For some reason, MPs have been struck by the poetry bug recently.  First there was the anonymously-penned verse attacking the Prime Minister.  And now Theresa May’s got in on the act, reading out her poem on Brown’s staffing problems in the Commons today.  Here it is: “At Downing Street the other day, I met a man sent on his way. Close to Gordon for many years, the PM’s rants brought him to tears. But for all this he didn’t care. He was pleased to see his minister there. He’d been important once, you know. Now Carter told him: ‘You must go.'” I doubt she’ll be winning the T.S. Eliot prize any time soon.  Can CoffeeHousers do