Politics

Read about the latest UK political news, views and analysis.

The week that was | 30 May 2008

Some highlights of the week on Spectator.co.uk: Matthew d’Ancona surveys the new political landscape. James Forsyth asks if New Labour can survive opposition and looks at the Cruddas alternative. Stephen Pollard explains why he is not unduly worried about 62 percent of the shadow cabinet being privately educated. Americano takes a look at McCain’s VP shortlist and looks at the Republican Obama should pick as his running mate. Clive Davis offers his take on whether Amy Winehouse lyrics have a place on a Cambridge exam paper. Michael Millar wonders why Barclays appears to be encouraging rather reckless financial behaviour and wonders what Northern Rock will do if, as expected, some

James Forsyth

The question Brown must answer if Labour is to recover

Stephen McCabe, the Labour whip who was in the charge of the Crewe and Nantwich campaign, has written an article for Tribune on his experience. The headlines will be grabbed by McCabe’s claim that there was no ‘toff strategy’ but more interesting is how he explains Labour’s defeat. “Nor could we stem the drift from Labour of the aspirational 25- and 35-plus age groups “Their message was simple. They were fed up with paying too much tax, too much for fuel and food, and feared for their economic future. Labour couldn’t claim to be on their side. That remains the big challenge. What will we do to win back those

James Forsyth

Labour’s targets for fighting crime are about as much use as a chocolate fireguard

Tim Montgomerie flags up how the targets culture is distorting policing priorities with arresting a child for stealing a chocolate bar treated by the police as being as important as arresting a murderer. There’s little doubt that the police are going for the low hanging fruit when it comes to meeting targets. Indeed, the only way to really measure how the police are serving the public is to make them fully accountable. If police chiefs had to stand for election and re-election it would force them to concentrate on the crimes that most bother the public.

James Forsyth

Brown leads Labour to a historic low–new poll has Lab 23, Con 47, Lib Dems 18 

The headlines figures in today’s YouGov poll are disastrous for Brown, the historical comparisons are humiliating—even under Michael Foot the Labour party never sank this low in the polls, but what should really worry Brown about this poll is that he and Labour now trail Cameron and the Tories on every question. Downing Street has been spinning the line that the recent election results have been so bad for Labour as they have been referendums on the government. The thinking goes that things will improve for Labour at the general election as it will be a choice between Labour and the Tories.  This new poll, though, offers no evidence for

Alex Massie

Brown Healthwatch

Good god, this is insane. PR Week reports: Gordon Brown’s latest comms offensive involves cold-calling members of the public who have written him letters, according to sources close to Downing Street. The initiative is said to be the brainchild of Downing Street chief of strategy Stephen Carter and is intended to ‘humanise’ the Prime Minister as his popularity continues to wane. ‘Carter thought it was a good idea to have Brown call people personally,’ said one insider. ‘Carter will choose a letter or email at random, have one of his team at Number 10 prepare a res­ponse, then get Brown to call.’ The move is an attempt to spread positive

James Forsyth

Hello, it’s Gordon here. I just wanted to explain…

When I saw this story I had to check the date but it is not an April Fool, Gordon Brown really is cold calling members of the public who write him critical letters.  PR Week, where else, reports that this is Stephen Carter’s latest ‘brainwave’: ‘Carter thought it was a good idea to have Brown call people personally,’ said one insider. ‘Carter will choose a letter or email at random, have one of his team at Number 10 prepare a res¬ponse, then get Brown to call.’ The potential for this to go horribly wrong is huge. Brown has already rung someone at 6am by mistake and it is not hard

James Forsyth

Will New Labour survive a general election defeat?

Let’s assume that, as currently seems likely, the Labour party loses the next election by a fairly substantial margin. The question then is does Labour conclude that the best route back to power is trying to knock the Tories off the centre ground or tacking to the left. As Matt notes, the temptation for a party after a heavy defeat is always to return to its ideological comfort zone—to imagine that a dose of the old religion will win back the public rather than just re-energising the faithful. Indeed, already the vast majority of prescriptions for how Brown can get back on track involve a significant shift leftward, a let

The new landscape

As John Prescott is fond of saying, the plates are moving. Two left-of-centre commentators today turn their attention to Labour’s predicament in ways that only emphasise its depth. Steve Richards – always essential reading – sets out the case for electoral reform and freely admits that only parties that are desperate take this issue seriously. Blair, he reveals, once told him that it would be “quixotic” to embrace PR or another variant shortly after winning a landslide by first-past-the-post. I suspect that Steve is right and that a lot of subterranean discussions are going on between Labour and the Lib Dems on this issue. One can only hope that Nick

James Forsyth

Labour pains | 29 May 2008

Guido flags up David Hencke’s story in The Guardian which reveals that Labour has only five weeks to find £7.45 million to pay off bank loans and money owed to some of the donors recruited by Lord Levy. Just to compound the problem, if Labour can’t find the cash then various individuals—including Gordon Brown and Harriet Harman—could find themselves personally liable for the party’s debts. 

Alex Massie

Not actually an April Fool

I waited until to check that it wasn’t actually April 2nd today, before posting this. It’s no great surprise to see a piece in the Telegraph begin: Politics is about both measures and men. Labour is over-obsessing about one man instead of asking whether our measures make sense. Any prime minister in office today would feel the voters’ anger as they see their cherished plans to spend their own money as they see fit destroyed by rising prices combined with the insatiable greed of the state in all its manifestations to take the people’s money for its own, often incompetent and counter-productive ends. But it’s rather more surprising to see

James Forsyth

Darling indicates that a government u-turn on fuel duty is coming

On The World at One this lunchtime, Alistair Darling strongly hinted that the government is preparing yet another u-turn; this time over the planned 2p rise in fuel duty. “I will return to the issue nearer the time – I will take into account what is happening in the oil market and see what is best to help out families and businesses. “I fully intend to come back to that before October.” I’m beginning to lose count of the number of climb downs that the Brown has been forced into since becoming Prime Minister. But I’d wager that it is a record number for a PM in his first year

James Forsyth

Brown’s pumped up meeting

The TV cameras trooped in to film the beginning of Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling’s meeting with various oil big-wigs this morning. After Brown thought they’d stopped filming, he announced: “Well that was an unreal start to a meeting… Now we can relax!” This really is Potemkin politics. It is hard to imagine that many voters will be fooled by today’s ‘summit’.

James Forsyth

Brown can look in The Mirror for advice

Kevin Maguire was widely tipped to be Gordon Brown’s Alastair Campbell but in the end the Mirror man stayed at his paper rather than heading to Downing Street. His columns, though, have always been fairly supportive of the Brown government which is what makes his piece today—“Gordon Brown must make sweeping changes”—so interesting. Maguire wants Brown to dump a whole bunch of policies including the planned 2p increase in fuel duty, ID cards and 42 day detention. In their place, he wants Brown to put: “a living wage in excess of £7 an hour to replace the minimum wage, free school meals for every kid, axing of NHS prescription charges

James Forsyth

Brown’s attempt to pour oil on troubled waters will fail

Gordon Brown wants you to blame somebody—anybody—else for the rise in the price of fuel. So, this morning he takes to the pages of The Guardian for some OPEC-bashing hoping that aggrieved motorists will curse this cartel rather than Brown when they see how much it costs to fill their tank. Later today, Brown and Darling, who rumour suggests is rather fed up with his next door neighbour, will meet with oil industry chiefs in Aberdeen. As Michael Millar points out over on Trading Floor, nothing productive is likely to come out of this meeting. But Team Brown hopes that it will provide the public with someone else to blame

Alex Massie

Tales from Labour Britain: Illegal Document Department

Via Samizdata, this seems to be a quite appalling story. The Guardian reports that: A masters student researching terrorist tactics who was arrested and detained for six days after his university informed police about al-Qaida-related material he downloaded has spoken of the “psychological torture” he endured in custody. Despite his Nottingham University supervisors insisting the materials were directly relevant to his research, Rizwaan Sabir, 22, was held for nearly a week under the Terrorism Act, accused of downloading the materials for illegal use. The student had obtained a copy of the al-Qaida training manual from a US government website for his research into terrorist tactics. Mind you, I don’t think

James Forsyth

Ken’s friend Qaradawi is no moderate

One of the many good things about Ken Livingstone’s defeat in the London mayoral election is that Islamic extremists will no longer be feted at City Hall. One person who should never have been invited and praised by the Mayor was Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who was not—as Livingstone claimed—someone “who preaches moderation and tolerance to all faiths throughout the world” but a preacher with vile views. Stephen links to a review, which I’d thoroughly recommend, of Qaradawi’s book which shows just how wrong Livingstone was about him.

James Forsyth

Brownism defined

Tom Bower, who wrote a rigorously researched and extremely critical biography of Gordon Brown, delivers a devastating summing up of Brown’s record to date in today’s Evening Standard: “Thatcherism and Blairism were easily defined but what exactly is Brownism? Obsessed that the state knows best, Brownism can best be described by its dubious achievements: record taxation, hyper-regulation, the biggest debts in Europe, the destruction of private pension schemes, post office closures, appalling public transport and a looming energy crisis.”

James Forsyth

Straw breaks his silence

Jack Straw has emerged from his self-imposed purdah to offer his support to Gordon Brown on The World at One. Straw declared “I’m absolutely convinced that Gordon Brown is the very best person to lead the Labour party and the government through these difficulties and beyond.” He went on to say that, “Nothing that has happened has changed my view that he is the best man for the job” (which makes me think that Straw holds his colleagues in rather low regard). Just in case he hadn’t sufficiently reassured the Brownites who have been so enraged by his silence, he concluded: “There is no contest, there will be no contest