Olivia Potts Olivia Potts

You are what you don’t eat

In the past, the ability to preserve food depended largely on people’s means, making Eleanor Barnett’s history of food waste also a history of changing attitudes to poverty

Curing herring by salting and packing in barrels. From ‘Graphic Illustrations of Animals and their Utility to Man’, c.1850. [Getty Images] 
issue 16 March 2024

If asked to think about food preservation for a moment you might picture an aproned woman boiling oranges for marmalade in a large copper maslin pan; or vegetable scraps being turned into stock; or those recipes from wartime rationing using root veg in place of sugar; or even, with an eye to the modern, you might imagine a trendy chef preparing offal in a gleaming chrome kitchen to ensure the nose-to-tail credentials of his restaurant.

Some of the attempts in the past to spin out the life of fresh produce sound positively disgusting

But there is more to the history of preservation than preserves, and the obvious enemy, when we talk about preservation, is waste – the two engaged in a constant battle. Exploring that battleground is Leftovers, the debut book from Eleanor Barnett, a food historian and academic.

The premise is simple: ‘From the moment food is harvested or slaughtered, it risks becoming inedible as it begins to ferment, rot and decompose.’

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in