Lucy Vickery

Writer’s block

issue 23 February 2019

In Competition No. 3086 you were invited to submit a poem about the difficulty of writing a poem.
 
In a far-larger-than-usual entry, A.H. Harker’s punchy couplet caught my eye:

I’m stuck.
Oh ****.

 
Elsewhere there were nods to Wordsworth, Milton and ‘The Thought Fox’, Ted Hughes’s wonderful poem about poetic inspiration. The winners below earn £25 each for their travails.

I struggled with my verse time after time,
Yet somehow I could never make it work.
It scanned quite well, but there’s no use pretending
My couplets had a satisfactory finish.
 
The words at their conclusion never matched;
They would not rhyme, however hard I rubbed
My head. The wretched quatrains fell apart,
And I despaired of mastering the skill.
 
But then, a rhyming dictionary transfigured
My verse; my audience no longer sniggered.
The deftness of my rhymes became astounding,
And critics’ praise unstintedly resounding.
 
I felt like stout Cortez — I mean, Balboa —
Discovering Mexico — or was it Goa?
A realm of gold, that book, no doubt about it;
I don’t know how I ever did without it.
Brian Allgar
 
It’s awfully hard to write a villanelle
Because your thoughts are trapped by repetition.
It’s tough to find the rhymes that cast a spell.
 
It might become an artificial shell,
An empty piece, an uninspired submission.
It’s awfully hard to write a villanelle.
 
And just when things seem to be going well
Shortage of rhyme will send you to perdition.
It’s tough to find the rhymes that cast a spell.
 
And where those rhymes will lead to none can tell;
For frequently they hamper your decision.
It’s awfully hard to write a villanelle.
 
It’s harder when you’ve sixteen lines to sell;
More would debar you from the competition.
It’s awfully hard to write a villanelle.
It’s tough to find the rhymes that cast a spell.
Frank McDonald
 
Nobody these days gets how hard
It has become to be a bard,
When ‘wandered lonely as a cloud’
Can rhyme online with ‘LOL’,
And everything one used to know
About love poems is rendered faux
By gender multiplicity.
















































Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in