Frank Keating

Wit and Wisden

Wit and Wisden

issue 15 April 2006

Two white-coated codgers bent over some sticks in north London yesterday morning. One cleared his throat and, in ritual tone of relief and contentment refound, undramatically announced, ‘Play!’ Considering everything, all was well with the world, and the 2006 first-class cricket season was officially under way at Lord’s — MCC v. Nottinghamshire; today begin six more three-sweater jobs when the gates are opened to the summer at the antique shrines of Hove and Chelmsford, Headingley and the Oval, Fenners and the Parks. Custom unstale, as ever, first toasts to the new season had been drunk in central London on Tuesday 11 April at the convivial black-tie dinner to launch the 143rd edition of the game’s illustriously perennial mustardy almanack.

Weighing in at precisely 1,600 pages, Wisden may be nearing unpickupability; for sure, there is an unputdownability about editor Matthew Engel’s latest annual, which makes 2006’s doorstop the most compelling (and collectable) must-have for many years. Last summer’s ravishing Ashes series sees to that. Every dot and comma of that spectacular seven weeks is first chronicled once again, then sagely, not to say sparkily, scrutinised. Reflections in tranquillity — from that breathtaking overture at Lord’s on the very first morning (21 July: Australia 97 for five at lunch) to England’s jubilant inner-city lap of honour via Trafalgar Square and No. 10 Downing Street on 13 September.

Apart from Wisden’s overladen table of refreshed annual goodies, Engel devotes 70 pages alone to the Ashes reverie. I enjoyed ‘hawkeye’ Simon Hughes’s clinical post-mortem: had umpire Bowden not given Kasprowicz out at Edgbaston (a marginal decision) to give England victory by two runs, and not given Pietersen ‘in’ (correctly) at the Oval when he was on nought — ‘then Australia would have regained the Ashes’; and Paul Hayward’s pay-off hits the spot on that debutant’s curtsey of astonishing brio: ‘Pietersen is surely the first man in flannels who chose to be famous, who set out to be world-renowned.

Illustration Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in