Richard Dawkins

Will the Supreme Court gender case victors get the apologies they deserve?

An activist celebrates victory outside the Supreme Court (Getty images)

Those who have won a great victory after years of struggle are entitled to enjoy a modest triumph, a single victory lap. But to crow too loudly is unseemly, and it is the mark of a small victor to pursue former opponents vindictively, taking vengeful advantage of new-found power to do so. An ugly object lesson is the small-minded man gleefully dominating American headlines today: a walking, talking, strutting, preening definition of how not to behave in victory.

If there’s one thing you can count on a woman to quite clearly not have, it is a penis

On 16 April, in London, the Supreme Court handed a stunning victory to those – mostly women – who have endured vilification, ruthless, relentless, sustained and vicious persecution, because they stood up for the obvious truth that a woman is an adult human female: the self-evident fact that a “trans woman” is a man, even if most have been too polite to say it in so many words.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in