Catriona Stewart

Why won’t NHS Fife come clean about its trans tribunal costs?

(Photo by ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)

When Scotland’s Freedom of Information legislation was brought before the Scottish parliament 20 years ago, the serving deputy first minister Jim Wallace told MSPs that enhanced openness would lead to better scrutiny and, therefore, to ‘increased public confidence in decisions that are made which affect people’s lives’. The Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act has been, as Wallace foresaw, a useful tool for journalists and members of the public to reveal the inner workings of public bodies. One Scottish health board, however, is trying hard to dodge scrutiny.

NHS Fife has found itself at the centre of a public storm as it fights an employment tribunal claim brought against it by nurse Sandie Peggie. Peggie lodged a claim of sexual harassment, harassment relating to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation against the health board after being compelled to share a changing room with a transgender doctor. Her claim is also against the doctor, Beth Upton, whose court costs are being covered in part by NHS Fife.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Written by
Catriona Stewart

Catriona Stewart is a freelance journalist, broadcaster and political commentator in Scotland and vice-chair of Women in Journalism Scotland. She is a former Herald columnist.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in