The Spectator

Why we don’t need another vote on euthanasia

Getty Images 
issue 16 March 2024

Ethical issues such as abortion and euthanasia are rightly considered matters of personal conscience for MPs at Westminster, so Keir Starmer’s promise of a vote on assisted dying does not automatically mean that Britain will follow Belgium, the Netherlands and Canada in legalising euthanasia, no matter how large a majority Labour might win. When the House of Commons held a similar vote in 2015, it was heavily defeated by 330 votes to 118, though Starmer himself voted in favour.

Nevertheless, we should be concerned about this development. The campaign for assisted dying has recently been energised by the intervention of Esther Rantzen, who is herself terminally ill with lung cancer. She is considering ending her life by travelling to the Swiss clinic Dignitas. There is the danger that the issue of assisted dying will come to be seen purely in terms of the suffering of the terminally ill, without regard to the wider implications or the experience of other countries, where there has often been mission creep.

Euthanasia brings about a fundamental devaluation of human life

The US state of Oregon has stuck to its original remit, which was to allow the terminally ill to end their lives.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in