Having spent five hours in the debate last night, one thing was absolutely clear: we are
all Eurosceptics now. So why did I choose to vote against the motion? It is because I believe that anger and frustration alone will not resolve our justifiable grievances towards the EU; we need a
clear-eyed strategy to move forward.
We can all agree that Europe in its current form is not working for us. We have passed powers to Brussels at the cost of undermining the sovereignty of Parliament. Regulations that hinder our
growth have not only been adopted but gold-plated, and with the Lisbon Treaty we are saddled with a constitution that no-one wanted and no-one voted for. Our national interest lies in reforming the
EU so that it becomes a help rather than a hindrance to addressing our economic challenges at home.
But to secure positive change, the Prime Minister needs maximum strategic flexibility.
Sam Gyimah-Mp
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in