Katy Balls Katy Balls

Why ‘no deal’ broke the Brexit committee

Last week, disgruntled MPs walked out of a meeting of the Commons Brexit Select Committee — chaired by Hilary Benn — in protest at a report they claimed was ‘too gloomy’. Today that report has been published in its 155-page entirety.  As expected, the committee is divided over its contents — with Tory members of the committee objecting to it. Dominic Raab says it is ‘rushed, skewed and partisan’, while his fellow committee member Alistair Carmichael claims it’s a devastating critique that shows ‘the government’s handling of Brexit makes a Jeremy Corbyn reshuffle look like a smooth operation’.

The Commons Brexit Select Committee is split over its latest report

The main source of contention concerns two paragraphs on the effects of a ‘no deal’. In contrast to Theresa May’s claim that no deal is better than a bad deal, it says that a ‘no deal’ in the negotiations represents ‘a very destructive outcome leading to mutually assured damage for the EU and the UK’ — and it is therefore ‘very important’ that this outcome is avoided.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in