Damian Thompson Damian Thompson

Why is Fauré not more celebrated?

Is it our fault that the music of the French composer often eludes us?

Fauré’s enemies called him Robespierre, an unlikely nickname for the elegant figure who drifted through the grandest Parisian salons: 1924 portrait by Ernest Laurent. © Photo Josse / Bridgeman Images  
issue 23 November 2024

It is 100 years since the death of Gabriel Fauré, a composer whose spellbinding romantic tunes emerge from harmonies and rhythms that nudge us towards the future. No other composer deploys such subversive mastery of the conventions of French music: again and again, if we look underneath the arches of his melodies, we find ambiguous chromatic shifts or disorientating spiralling arpeggios.

For some critics, the musical argument of Fauré’s late chamber work is so understated it evaporates

And – see above – no other French composer is so hard to describe without falling into a purple puddle. I’ve already used up spellbinding, subversive and ambiguous, but that still leaves subtle, sophisticated, exquisite, reflective and a dozen other adjectives before we reach the laziest but most useful of them all: elusive. That word is a get-out-of-jail-free card: ‘Fauré is a composer, subtle, elusive and precise’… ‘Fauré’s music tends to be elusive, sometimes cryptic’… ‘The mélodies of Gabriel Fauré lie at the heart of his romantic but elusive style’, etc.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in