Andrew Willshire

Why ‘indicative votes’ would be a terrible idea

Whether or not Theresa May manages to bring forward another Meaningful Vote on her Brexit deal before 12 April, it now seems likely that — in an attempt to clear the Brexit log-jam — parliament will be offered a series of ‘indicative votes’, so that MPs have a chance to say what their preferred Brexit option would be.

There will probably be seven options:

  • Theresa May’s deal
  • No deal
  • A second referendum (doubtless to be followed by months of wrangling on what the question would be)
  • Revoke Article 50 (either to stay permanently in the EU or, as some have suggested, to begin the process of leaving again from scratch at a later date. However, a large number of petitioners would be delighted.)
  • A Canada-style free trade agreement (which would require a customs border in the Irish Sea)
  • The May deal, but with a permanent customs union (Labour’s preferred option in order to, umm, prevent the backstop from becoming a permanent customs union)
  • The May deal, but staying in the single market (and accepting freedom of movement)

Unfortunately, like everything else in this sorry business, it isn’t as simple as that.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in