Mary Dejevsky

Why does Britain refuse to swap hostages?

Richard Ratcliffe, the husband of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, protesting outside the Iranian embassy in London (ISABEL INFANTES/AFP via Getty Images)

In the last days of November, Dr Kylie Moore-Gilbert was released from Tehran’s Evin prison and flown back to a welcome in Australia. A dual Australian-UK national, she had served two years of a ten-year sentence for espionage — pronounced after a secret trial. She had been in Iran for a conference and was detained as she was about to leave. She had strongly protested her innocence.


So why, many Britons might ask, is the Australian-British academic suddenly free after two years in which the Iranian security services tried in vain to ‘turn’ her — while the UK-Iranian dual national, Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, remains under house arrest in Tehran, with the prospect of another trial and a return to prison. Employed by a media foundation in Oxford, Zaghari-Ratcliffe was detained during a visit to her parents four years ago, and — like Moore-Gilbert — rejects all suggestions of spying.

The answer, alas, to the question of why one woman is free while the other is not, is that Australia was prepared to do a deal.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in