Deborah Ross

Why does anyone still rate Vertigo and its creepy, wonky plot?

Hitchcock’s thriller is hailed as the greatest film of all time by Sight & Sound, but its plot is full of holes and it’s creepy, and not in a good way

Creepy, but not in a good way: Kim Novak as Madeleine and James Stewart as Scottie in Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo [Archive Photos/Getty Images] 
issue 16 May 2020

Here’s something that may interest you. Or not. (Could go either way.) I was looking over Sight & Sound’s ‘100 Greatest Films of All Time’, which has Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo (1958) at number one, having knocked Citizen Kane from the top spot in 2012. (That film always did need a more exciting reveal; would it have helped if Rosebud had turned out to be a massive fireball or dinosaur egg?)

But back to Vertigo, which is now the best film ever made. Really? That worried away at me. Who rates this film and why? The storytelling isn’t up to much. It drags and drags. (The first half is a dull schlep around San Francisco as we follow the world’s most obvious stalker.) It’s riddled with plot holes. It’s creepy, but not in a good way. It manipulates its women and then thrills in coldly punishing them while the men walk away.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in