When the anti-corruption minister is accused of corruption by a foreign government and has no prospect of being able to shut the story down any time soon, it is perfectly obvious that her position is untenable. Yet Keir Starmer allowed the furore over Tulip Siddiq to run for several weeks before the obvious resolution – that she must step down from her ministerial role – was implemented.
The Tulip Siddiq furore may drop out of the headlines but it could return in a more virulent form
Siddiq was named as a suspect in a corruption investigation by Bangladesh back on 19 December. Since then the controversy over the Hampstead and Highgate MP, who stands accused of benefiting from widespread financial plunder in Bangladesh allegedly carried out by her aunt Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League political party, has rarely been out of the headlines. Siddiq denies the claims.
The report into the affair by Sir Laurie Magnus, the PM’s ethics adviser, was a masterpiece in achieving a desired outcome – Siddiq’s departure from the government – without explicitly knocking further lumps out of her reputation.
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in