Digby Warde-Aldam

Why art biennales are (mostly) rubbish

One of the worst things about the 300-plus biennials that have sprung up across the globe is their belief that they're saving the world

At Malta’s current art biennale – the country’s first – the venues were rather more interesting than the displays: the work of Sandra Zaffarese at the National Library of Valletta. Credit: Julian Vassallo 
issue 30 March 2024

Should you visit Malta this spring, you may notice something decidedly weird is afoot. Across the public squares of its capital, Valletta, performance artists are blocking busy thoroughfares and causing havoc on packed café terraces. The Hospitaller and British military forts that dominate the capital’s famous harbour, meanwhile, are full of dysfunctional installation work, while the curio-filled vitrines of local museums are forced to compete with video art. Even the Grandmaster’s Palace – for centuries the country’s seat of power – has accommodated several dozen mini-exhibitions on the theme of ‘the Matri-archive of the Mediterranean’. As more than one artist showing work in these places told me, the venues were rather more interesting than the displays to which they had been given over.

Over the past decade and a bit, the average biennale has come to see itself as an agent for social change

The occasion for all this is the tiny Mediterranean nation’s first art biennale, an event that encompasses 20 or so venues spread across its two principal islands, and by my count features the work of about 70 different artists.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in