James Innes-Smith

Who needs Hollywood actors anyway?

Striking stars are naïve if they think they can hold back the technological tide

  • From Spectator Life
[Getty Images]

For the past week Hollywood’s film and television actors have been on strike, plunging Los Angeles’s most famous industry into chaos. Performers joined screenwriters (who have been striking since May) on the picket line after talks broke down in what has become the first simultaneous strike in more than 60 years.

The strikes have attracted plenty of headlines, not least when the cast of Oppenheimer walked out of its UK premiere last week. But do we really care if studios have to shelve Fast and Furious 15, or if the latest superhero movie fails to take flight – or indeed if the entire cocaine-encrusted edifice crumbles into the Pacific Ocean?

Hollywood has been a busted flush ever since the moguls decided the only way to maintain their mansions was to appeal to the least discerning demographic, namely hyperactive teenagers

The truth is, Hollywood has been a busted flush ever since the moguls decided the only way to maintain their mansions was to appeal to the least discerning demographic of all, namely hyperactive teenagers.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in