Peter Hoskin

White House Down is Roland Emmerich’s Hedda Gabler

issue 14 September 2013

Just do it, quoth the Nike advert — and these men just did it. Grass, asphalt, fear, pain, doubt and limitation; all surpassed in the pursuit of human excellence. The racing driver James Hunt and the baseball player Jackie Robinson may have practised different sports, but they were both champions. And, with Rush and 42, they both have fine-looking films dedicated to them this week. Cinemagoers who want to tread the contours of greatness, and understand its peaks and troughs, need look no further. Hollywood has it covered.

But for those of you who just want to see some stuff blow up and some bad guys capped, then how about the movie I actually ended up watching? Roland Emmerich’s White House Down.

White House Down is, of course, the second film on the theme of terrorists-knock-out-the-White-House-before-being-scuppered-by-one-man-with-lots-of-guns this year, after Olympus Has Fallen. But before we charge it with plagiarism, it’s worth remembering that director Emmerich has form in this area. The White House was comprehensively obliterated by alien death rays in his Independence Day (1996), and it must have been damaged beyond easy repair in his ecopocalypse spectacles The Day After Tomorrow (2004) and 2012 (2009). In fact, by limiting the destruction to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Emmerich is being more restrained than usual. This is his equivalent of an intimate costume drama. This is his Hedda Gabler.

Although Ibsen would surely write sharper dialogue than this. The first, overstretched third of White House Down is a mix of sappy exposition and even sappier politics. There’s Jamie Foxx as President Obama …no, sorry …President Sawyer, who wants to bring about endless peace in the Middle East by withdrawing all western troops and replacing them with a basquillion dollars of aid money.

GIF Image

You might disagree with half of it, but you’ll enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just £1 a month

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.

Already a subscriber? Log in