Catriona Stewart

When will Labour get specific about its stance on gender reform?

(Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)

In a general election campaign that has oftentimes presented scenarios that feel like a fever dream, the surreal headlines keep coming. ‘Sir Keir Starmer agrees with Sir Tony Blair,’ we read this week, ‘that a man has a penis and a woman has a vagina’. Newspaper articles focused on two Labour leaders in simpatico and this is the outcome? ‘Tony’s right about that,’ Sir Keir said, in response to his colleague’s statement of fact: ‘He put it very well.’ That clattering noise is the sound of women’s eyebrows shooting from their heads to hit the ceiling; women who have said – and said repeatedly – this very thing, only to receive abuse.

While the manifesto pledges may differ in substance, they have in common the fact they are both frustratingly vague.

What we have in the ongoing debate around sex and gender is a slow shifting in position brought by campaigning from gender critical women, by high-profile criminal justice cases and by the recent Cass Review of NHS gender services. This

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in