Hm. Seems like Alan Johnson has chosen the day that Gordon’s away in Italy to write another comment piece on voting reform. Like his article for the Times a few months ago, it pushes the AV+ version of proportional representation. And, like his Times article, it goes out of its way to mention Brown (“I work for a leader who accepts the need for … renewal”), but it still comes across as an attempt to grab the leadership limelight. After all, why should the Home Secretary be reiterating points he’s made before about voing reform? Why isn’t he leaving this attention-grabbing stuff for his leader who “accepts the need for renewal”? And why now?
I imagine the reponse from Downing Street – if there is one – will be the same as last time: to welcome this “contribution” to the debate. But quite a few Brownites will be left unimpressed, if not fuming.
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in