Isabel Hardman Isabel Hardman

Why are the Tories, Labour and the SNP changing their tune on Gaza?

Israeli airstrikes on Gaza (Credit: Getty Images)

The government has now tabled its own amendment to the SNP motion calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. This change to the text calls for ‘negotiations to agree an immediate humanitarian pause as the best way to stop the fighting’, and then ‘moves towards a permanent sustainable ceasefire’. It also says that a ceasefire requires all hostages to be released, the formation of a new Palestinian government and – crucially – ‘Hamas to be unable to launch further attacks and no longer in charge of Gaza, and a credible pathway to a two-state solution’.

It’s worth remembering that this is an Opposition Day debate, which is not binding on the government at all, and thus far the pressure has been on Labour, rather than Conservative, MPs. The SNP’s Westminster group leader Stephen Flynn addressed his open letter to Labour backbenchers, rather than Conservatives, and the government can put the whole debate on a one line whip for its own MPs to take the heat out of it and suggest they don’t turn up at all.

Isabel Hardman
Written by
Isabel Hardman
Isabel Hardman is assistant editor of The Spectator and author of Why We Get the Wrong Politicians. She also presents Radio 4’s Week in Westminster.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in