Julian Hughes

What would George Orwell make of the assisted dying debate?

Credit: Getty images

George Orwell would have plenty to say about the language used in the assisted dying debate. As Orwell wrote in his essay ‘Politics and the English Language’: ‘When you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself’. He continued, ‘political language … is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind’. Never has this been truer than in relation to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, which is back for debate in parliament today.

Dignity in Dying, the organisation that campaigns in favour of assisted dying, would certainly trouble Orwell. In 2006, after just over 70 years, the Voluntary Euthanasia Society changed its name to Dignity in Dying. The name ‘Voluntary Euthanasia Society’ tells you what the society is about; ‘Dignity in Dying’ does not. This shows just how language can corrupt thought, something against which Orwell railed.

The debate on assisted dying is rife with troubling possibilities

‘Dignity in dying’ is the aim of any hospice worth its salt.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Written by
Julian Hughes

Professor Julian C. Hughes is a retired consultant in old age psychiatry and former deputy chair of the Nuffield Council on Bioethics. He is an honorary professor at the University of Bristol and co-wrote ‘The Reality of Assisted Dying: Understanding the Issues’ with Baroness Ilora Finlay.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in