There is a tonne of contradictory stuff flying around about what Michel Barnier says is the EU’s bottom line for fair competition in any free trade agreement with the UK. As I understand it, what follows is the EU’s position.
For the ‘level playing field commitments’ there should be ‘non-regression’ — i.e. on standards for working practices, environmental rules etc., the UK must stick to current EU rules and subject to tests. There would be a risk of legal challenge if there is a perceived breach of the obligations. And the non-regression rules apply to the EU as well as to the UK. They are mutual symmetrical obligations in that sense.
The EU’s disproportionate economic power won’t vanish if there is no free trade agreement
The requirements not to give unfair subsidies to businesses — the state aid rules — are different, and more complicated, because subsidies to businesses given out of EU funds (as opposed to national funds) are not subject to state aid rules.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in