Jerusalem, Israel
Syria received top-billing in our meeting with the Israeli prime minster’s spokesman – Mark Regev – in Jerusalem this morning. Sadly, though, he was tight-lipped about that intriguing Israeli strike on a Syrian nuclear facility. How much did the Americans know? “No comment”. Was there a risk of wider conflict? “No comment”. Wha…? “No comment”.
What he did say, however, was revealing. Israel is so keen to enter meaningful dialogue with Damascus – and to come to some sort of peace agreement – that they’re going to avoid upsetting the apple-cart in public. As Regev put it: “If there is going to be progress [with Syria], then it won’t be on the front pages.” Hence the radio silence on that nuclear facility.
It’s an understandable position. After all, peace with Syria has clear security benefits for Israel (it would break up the Iranian-Syrian axis, and force the terrorist groups which currently congregate in Syria to retreat to Tehran – a much safer distance).
Britain’s best politics newsletters
You get two free articles each week when you sign up to The Spectator’s emails.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in