Eliot Wilson Eliot Wilson

What Rishi Sunak got wrong about Lee Anderson

Lee Anderson and Rishi Sunak (Credit: Getty images)

Lee Anderson’s defection from the Tories to Reform UK was hardly a surprise. In fact, it seemed almost inevitable. But that Anderson rose to the position he did within the Conservative party to become deputy chairman, before flouncing out, raises questions about Sunak’s political judgement. Anderson became an emblem of the Red Wall, yet is he really representative of voters from the north?

Sunak’s superficial reading of Anderson led him to think that he could be a bridge to the Red Wall

Anderson’s blunt language has powered his brief career as a Conservative MP. Because he said undiplomatic, unwise or unhelpful things, and because his background was unimpeachably and authentically working class, Rishi Sunak and his advisers chose him as a kind of avatar for ‘Red Wall’ voters.

The Prime Minister made a bad calculation. His own background – Winchester, Oxford, Stanford Business School, Goldman Sachs – gave him no insight into the former Labour strongholds whose support he inherited.

Written by
Eliot Wilson

Eliot Wilson was a clerk in the House of Commons 2005-16, including on the Defence Committee. He is a member of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI).

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in