Lee Anderson’s defection from the Tories to Reform UK was hardly a surprise. In fact, it seemed almost inevitable. But that Anderson rose to the position he did within the Conservative party to become deputy chairman, before flouncing out, raises questions about Sunak’s political judgement. Anderson became an emblem of the Red Wall, yet is he really representative of voters from the north?
Anderson’s blunt language has powered his brief career as a Conservative MP. Because he said undiplomatic, unwise or unhelpful things, and because his background was unimpeachably and authentically working class, Rishi Sunak and his advisers chose him as a kind of avatar for ‘Red Wall’ voters.
The Prime Minister made a bad calculation. His own background – Winchester, Oxford, Stanford Business School, Goldman Sachs – gave him no insight into the former Labour strongholds whose support he inherited.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in