I’ve always found it shocking that British troops are sent into combat with inadequate equipment – not least because it costs lives. That’s why today’s High Court ruling should be welcomed. Invoking the human rights of servicemen could – to some extent – safeguard against future tragedies.
Even so, Des Browne’s fighting the decision tooth-and-nail. Here’s his response:
“Our troops are very well equipped, there have been great improvements made because we found ourselves two years ago in a very difficult and changing environment. They are as well equipped as anywhere else in the world. This criticism is a dated criticism from a different time is not applicable to the troops currently deployed.”
It doesn’t make much sense. If British troops are now universally well-equipped, what’s the MoD got to worry about? Perhaps CoffeeHousers can explain.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in