A strange language is spoken on Planet Finance. It often seems designed to baffle the average investor, and save the richest pickings for the professionals. Take, for example, ‘investment trusts’ — they’re investments, certainly, but they are not trusts. And since blind faith is the last thing to invest in any money-making exercise, the two terms make an odd pairing.
The most important decision an average investor has to make is to trust their money with a good manager in a promising sector. And this is the main attraction of Investment Trusts. If you fancied a bet on Japan, for example, your first thought may be a straightforward fund, like Fidelity’s Japan Fund, with a 1.5 per cent annual management fee. But why might an investor instead go for an investment trust like Schroder’s ‘Japan Growth Fund Plc?’ And why does an investment fund pose as a company — with directors, plc status and its own separate stock exchange listing?
Investment trusts tend to offer great flexibility, and make it relatively easy for investors to hold their professional advisers to account.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in