The phone-hacking saga has just been given a new lease of life after a judge ruled that Prince Harry can take the Daily Mail to court over claims that it used ‘unlawful information gathering’ in stories about him. The newspaper has never been involved in the historic hacking claims, and said evidence to the contrary assembled by the Duke of Sussex and six other high-profile claimants was ropey and that it was brought ‘far too late’ for the trial to take place. The High Court today disagreed: Mr Justice Nicklin said the newspaper group hadn’t delivered a ‘knockout blow’ to the ‘claims of any of these claimants’.
This matters. Newspaper sales are declining in Britain and so far more than £1.1 billion (£900 million alone to lawyers) has been paid out by Rupert Murdoch’s News UK to those claiming they had been hacked by the Sun and the News of the World – even if the evidence was circumstantial.
This case is likely to add to the drumbeat for state regulation of the press
Associated Newspapers Ltd (publisher of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and MailOnline) had been refusing to settle with claimants, seeing this as a racket.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in