Michael Henderson

What Federer isn’t

There is no such thing as a sporting genius

issue 14 July 2012

This summer, like so many others in the past decade, belongs to Roger Federer. By reclaiming the men’s singles title at Wimbledon, after giving Andy Murray a set start, the peerless Swiss revealed what true greatness looks like in sporting togs. Seven times a Wimbledon champion, 17 times a winner of Grand Slam events: his record compels not so much admiration as awe, and it will surprise nobody if, next month, he retains the Olympic title he won four years ago.

He is, by general assent, the greatest of all tennis players, standing a cubit taller than Rod Laver, the Australian champion of the Sixties, who was at centre court to witness Federer’s latest achievement. He is certainly the most gracious man ever to swing a racket, which is why so many of us were rooting for him to beat Murray. If you believe that sport is a thing of beauty then you must love Federer, above all other tennis players; indeed, above all other sportsmen.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in