There’s been some hubbub on the good ol’ blogosphere about Darling’s claim that Labour spending cuts would be “deeper and tougher” than Thatcher’s. Did Thatcher actually cut spending? What would that indicatate about Labour’s plans? And so on.
Part of the confusion is caused by the different metrics that are referred to as “spending”. So here’s a quick guide to what Darling might have had in mind:
OPTION 1: Real-terms total spending. As the below graph from the IFS shows (taken from this excellent blogpost by the FT’s Alex Barker), real-terms total public spending only fell in two years of the Thatcher premiership. In all the other years it rose. Indeed, spending increased by an average of 1.1 percent a year across the Thatcher premiership:
By contrast, the IFS calculate that total spending will rise by around 0.4 percent a year during the first term of a Labour Parliament.
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in