James Snell

What the ‘experts’ got wrong about Syria

Rebels ride military vehicles along a road in the eastern part of Aleppo (Getty Images)

Provincial capitals falling before an unexpected advance. Military units allegedly defecting, deserting or switching sides. Talk of a coup in Damascus. The Syria of 2012 is the Syria of 2024.

For years this was a so-called ‘frozen conflict’. The front lines did not move, no matter how many artillery and aerial attacks there were on civilians in the country’s north. The maps did not change, though dozens of people at a minimum were killed in fighting every week.

But now Syria’s civil conflict has reignited.

From their portion of Idlib province, a broad coalition of armed groups led by the Islamists Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) have taken over a significant swathe of territory. This includes Aleppo, Syria’s largest city, its economic heart, and much of Aleppo’s surrounds; the rest of Idlib; and increasing numbers of towns and villages in Hama province.

The lazy assumptions of many have been shown to be false

Wild rumours talk of the imminent fall of Hama city (site of a famous uprising against Hafez al-Assad, the father of the current president, Bashar), and of a military coup in Damascus.

Written by
James Snell

James Snell is a senior advisor for special initiatives at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy. His upcoming book, Defeat, about the failure of the war in Afghanistan and the future of terrorism, will be published by Gibson Square next year.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in