Martin Vander Weyer Martin Vander Weyer

We’d all like to see Fred on the hook but RBS investors will be wiser to settle

Also in Any Other Business: In praise of Enda Kenny — how the departing Taoiseach dug Ireland out of its black hole

issue 27 May 2017

‘Fred Goodwin off the hook again,’ declared the Scottish Daily Record. That neatly summed up one strand of sentiment behind the RBS Shareholder Action Group’s battle for compensation for losses incurred in the bank’s £12 billion rights issue in 2008 — preceding its £45 billion taxpayer bailout, in which any remaining shareholder value was largely wiped out. Investors who believe they were misled by RBS’s directors and the rights-issue prospectus have been campaigning for their money back ever since.

Most have already accepted a rather modest settlement, but some 9,000 have persevered with a case against the bank itself, Goodwin, former chairman Sir Tom McKillop and two other former directors, which was due in court last Monday for a lengthy trial, in which Goodwin et al would have been called to give evidence. That prospect was particularly relished by angry investors who resent Goodwin’s continuing £342,000-a-year RBS pension. But after a last-minute offer from RBS at almost double the previous settlement price per share, the trial was deferred.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in