Martin Vander Weyer Martin Vander Weyer

Watch out: Standard Chartered is even trickier to manage than credit default swaps

Plus: Why the other bank chiefs should be more careful about claiming their bonuses, and the fate of Peter Hambro’s gold mines

issue 07 March 2015

One day you’re an elder statesman, chairing top committees and pontificating on Question Time, and the next you’re out in the cold, reading terrible headlines about yourself in the newspapers you’re trying to sleep under on a park bench. Well, perhaps not as bad as that — but as it is for former foreign secretaries, so it is for overseas bankers.

Standard Chartered chief executive Peter Sands, I wrote in 2012, was ‘one of the few British bankers whose reputation has actually risen in recent years’; his bank was a ‘dull old dog’, but it was also steadily profitable and sensibly managed. Then came sanctions-busting scandal, unwise expansion, slipping profits and disgruntled shareholders. Now Sands is leaving in a boardroom cull that chairman Sir John Peace attempted to pass off as a routine ‘refresh’ — before revealing that he would also refresh himself by retiring next year.

Then there’s Stuart Gulliver, the safe pair of hands who led HSBC’s global banking arm through the financial crisis before being named chief executive in 2011.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in