Mary Kenny

Was the Abdication necessary?

The Eagle & the Crown, by Frank Prochaska

issue 10 January 2009

At least one very startling claim emerges in this study: according to her own account, Wallis, Duchess of Windsor, never consummated her first two marriages. Indeed, she never allowed any man (before the Duke of Windsor, presumably) to touch her ‘below the Mason-Dixon line’. If this is true, it makes a nonsense of the Abdication, since an unconsummated marriage, within Christian canon law, is automatically grounds for annulment. This would mean that the lady was not — or did not need to be — a divorcee, and thus her pairing with Edward, Prince of Wales, should have raised no objection whatsoever.

Wallis certainly did represent a kind of American triumph in the realms of the British monarchy: the Baltimore girl who captured the heart of a king and for whom he sacrificed an empire. Famously, the American press was running with the story long before it was disclosed on this side of the Atlantic, and in its traditional firecracker manner: ‘King’s Moll Reno’d in Wolsey’s Home Town’ and ‘King Will Wed Wally’.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in