The trouble with holding a ministerial debate in public is that, when it comes to the
crunch, it’s obvious who the winners and losers are. So it is with Vince Cable and higher education funding. A couple of months ago, the business secretary tap-danced onto the stage with a
(problematic) plan for a new graduate tax. Now, it seems clear that the Browne Review will reject his advice (£) in favour of increasing tuition fees. And so Cable has had to send out an excruciating email
explaining why a graduate tax was never really a good idea in the first place. After the flip comes the flop, so to speak.
But this isn’t just about Cable’s embarrassment. Before the last election, the Lib Dems pledged never to increase tuition fees – but now they are part of a government which may do just that. This puts them at a fork in the road: do they abstain from any vote to increase tuition fees, as suggested in the coalition
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33b44/33b44f1966e79a8bbc533866eeb159e672891b43" alt=""
Get Britain's best politics newsletters
Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.
Already a subscriber? Log in
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in