Matthew Dancona

Unfunded spending

My prize for comment of the day goes to CS responding to my earlier post on Patricia Hewitt:

“Just saw Old Pat on the TV slagging off her opponents’ ‘unfunded policies’. If the government has a budget deficit which it keeps having to revise upwards, doesn’t that mean that its own spending is unfunded?”

This is a simple but brilliant point. We will hear the mantra “unfunded policies” from Labour more often than I care to mention: at present the figure alleged by Gordon and co. is £10 billion-worth of such Tory measures. But – even assuming this is an accurate figure – £10 billion is small potatoes compared to the deficit the Labour Government has already chalked up. One of Paddy Ashdown’s more effective attack lines before the 1997 election was to refer all the time to the “John Major Debt” and the cost of servicing it. The Tories should do the same to Gordon.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in