Simon Parkin

Uncomfortable truths about the siege of Leningrad

The legend of heroic resistance during the 872-day blockade helped many survivors bear the guilt of having robbed, betrayed, murdered and even eaten their fellow citizens

The fire of anti-aircraft guns deployed in the neighbourhood of St Isaac’s Cathedral during the defence of Leningrad. [Alamy] 
issue 07 September 2024

Even before the 872-day long siege ended, both survivors and onlookers had already begun to refer to Leningrad – formerly and currently known as St Petersburg – as a city of heroes. Tales of bravery and self-sacrifice were enshrined in memorials, histories and memoirs, which between 1945 and 1991 were published in the Soviet Union at an average rate of one per day. But heroism is, of course, only a partial description of life within the starving city where theft, murder, betrayal and a million smaller acts of self-interest were just as prevalent as acts of valour. The idea that Leningrad was a city of heroes was in part a ploy to enable the living to carry on alongside their survivors’ guilt, sometimes inside apartments they had taken from the newly dead.

Yet, as Prit Buttar, a former British Army doctor, draws out in a dense, ambitious and military-focused book, Leningrad endured, despite its institutional abandonment by Moscow, a dispirited and often outclassed Red Army and the near total breakdown of supply chains.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in