Phillips O'Brien

Ukraine needs more than tanks

U.S. Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) firing a missile during a South Korea-U.S. joint missile drill in 2017. (Photo by South Korean Defense Ministry via Getty Images)

What weapons will Ukraine get next? It’s a crucial question that matters perhaps more than anything else for understanding how the Russo-Ukraine war will end. For the last few months two different systems have received the most attention, systems that Ukraine has asked for almost daily. These are tanks, or MBTs (Main Battle Tanks), the key armoured vehicle of 20th and 21st century land warfare, and ATACMS (Army Tactical Missile Systems), the longest-range ammunition now available for the US-made HIMARS rocket launchers already in Ukraine. 

Both are needed for the quickest possible Ukrainian victory in the war, though for now it seems that the first, tanks, are on their way and the other, ATACMS, are still a while away.  

Nato-standard MBTs, such as British-made Challengers or German-made Leopards, look very much to be heading to Ukraine. This weekend, it was reported that the UK government had assured the Ukrainian government that Challenger 2s (probably only a small number) will be going to Kyiv in the not-too-distant future.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in