James Snell

Ukraine is paying a heavy price for Nato’s dithering

Ukrainian soldiers drive a tank outside of Siversk, which is situated near the front line with Russia, 21 January 2023 (Getty Images)

It is winter in Ukraine. The ground is frozen and hard. Groups of soldiers on both sides struggle in the cold. The Ukrainians insist they have one advantage over the Russians: their soldiers, unlike mobilised Russian troops, have some effective winter clothing.  

Traditionally, armies stop moving in winter. They hunker down. It’s less true in Ukraine, where winter does not mean paralysis for civilian or army life. But in much of the country, the frontline does appear frozen – figuratively and literally. But winter ends quickly, especially in wartime. 

Western intelligence agencies believe that a new Russian offensive is in the offing. They say a new attack will begin in either early spring or, possibly, at the tail end of the winter.  

Perhaps there will be a new wave of mobilisation. The Russian military is theoretically supposed to grow to 1.5 million troops over an undisclosed period of time – although the immediate relevance this would have on the ground in Ukraine is unclear.  

Ukraine’s requests for tanks and armoured fighting vehicles are not illogical or spoilt: they are of the greatest importance

It would be the work of one speech by the Russian president to begin a new wave of mobilisation.

Written by
James Snell

James Snell is a senior advisor for special initiatives at the New Lines Institute for Strategy and Policy. His upcoming book, Defeat, about the failure of the war in Afghanistan and the future of terrorism, will be published by Gibson Square next year.

Topics in this article

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in