Christina Lamb

Trapped in the palace

If we really want Gaddafi to go, we should let him retire in peace

issue 28 May 2011

When Barack Obama and David Cameron met in London this week, one problem would have been foremost in their minds. It’s more than six weeks since they penned their joint article with Nicolas Sarkozy demanding that ‘Gaddafi must go’. It’s more than two months since they started airstrikes in Libya. Yet Gaddafi is stubbornly refusing to be toppled.

He is not alone. In Yemen, Ali Abdullah Saleh has reneged on two deals to step down and, at the last minute, refused to sign a third — despite an American promise of immunity. In Syria, Bashar Assad seems determined to stay on through sheer bloody force, unmoved by US and EU sanctions. In Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe has announced that he will run for president again this year at the age of 87. How do you persuade despots to step down if airstrikes, sanctions, international condemnation, regional pressure, declarations that they are war criminals or even offers of immunity won’t sway them? The problem becomes particularly acute when they know only too well you don’t want to put boots on ground to oust them militarily.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in