Daisy Dunn

They weren’t all scheming poisoners: the maligned women of imperial Rome

Joan Smith criticises the distortions of Robert Graves in particular, whose villainisation of the empress Livia had no historical basis whatever

Statue of Livia, the wife of the Emperor Augustus. [Getty Images] 
issue 02 November 2024

Unfortunately, She Was a Nymphomaniac must be one of the most eye-catching book titles of the year. I assumed it was just a riff on John Ford’s 17th-century tragedy ’Tis Pity She’s a Whore, but apparently it came directly from the mouth of a modern tour guide in a museum in Rome. The man was describing Julia, the daughter of the first Roman emperor Augustus, when Joan Smith stepped in. ‘Julia,’ she corrected him, ‘was not a nymphomaniac.’

The rattled guide, who conceded that he was merely following the (biased) ancient sources, may be relieved to learn that he has not been singled out. Smith, the author of the barnstorming Misogynies, takes many others to task for insensitivity in her new history of 23 women of the Julio-Claudian dynasty. Tom Holland, Guy de la Bédoyère and even Mary Beard are among the writers of popular ancient history in her firing line. 

Smith approaches the women of the early empire from a very different perspective to these historians.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in