Reforms to the funding of higher education over the past decade, although not perfect, have been broadly successful. There’s now record levels of individuals and investment in English universities.
Theresa May, though, thought differently. Immediately after the last election, in response to a staggering number of young people turning their back on the Tories, she commissioned the Augar Review, promising major reforms to tuition fees. Much like the emergence of her flagship net migration target, the idea was actually first floated – unofficially – by her then First Secretary of State Damian Green.
The announcement was rooted in the erroneous belief that young people flocked to Jeremy Corbyn because of his promise to abolish tuition fees and student debt, deflecting from the Prime Minister’s other policy and leadership failings. And the higher education sector, with astronomical vice-chancellor salaries and little variability in the fees charged, became another broken market that May and her coterie were determined to demonstrate they would fix.
Notwithstanding some sensible stuff in the Augar Review, the exercise has been yet another grave political misjudgment by the Prime Minister.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in