Michael Ledger-Lomas

There’s much to be said for nostalgia

Instead of condemning it as dangerous fantasy, two new books argue that we should welcome nostalgia as ‘emotional armour’ in a fast-changing world

Preparations for a jousting tournament at The Leeds Armouries in March this year as teams from the UK, France and Italy compete. [Getty Images] 
issue 11 May 2024

Michel Barnier, the chief negotiator for the EU Commission, called Brexit an expression of ‘hope for a return to a powerful global Britain, nostalgia for the past’ – a mood that ‘serves no purpose in politics’. Popular historians have echoed his view of nostalgia as a syndrome which affects declining societies such as Great Britain. The yearning for a happier past got Donald Trump elected and may re-elect him; it breeds xenophobia and locks societies into a doom loop of reruns, remakes and Facebook feeds of photographs from olden times. Or does it? Two new histories of nostalgia are sceptical about how pervasive or dangerous it really is.

Agnes Arnold-Forster’s shrewd, digressive book is the more accessible of the two. A historian of medicine and emotion, she is primarily interested in when and how we have pathologised emotional attachment to the past. Her story begins in 1688, when the physician Andreas Hofer coined the term ‘nostalgia’ to diagnose the craving for home that prostrated and sometimes killed Swiss mercenaries.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in