The Prime Minister’s speech on foreign policy at the Mansion House this week was a classic instance of reassurance rhetoric: his intention to soothe Atlanticists on both sides of the ocean, worried by the studied distance Mr Brown adopted at Camp David in July and the mixed signals sent by his ministerial team. Tribute was paid to ‘the personal leadership of President Bush’ in the search for peace in the Middle East and the American alliance was reaffirmed as ‘our most important bilateral relationship’. Even Tony Blair was rehabilitated for the occasion, with a tribute to his ‘painstaking work’ in the Middle East.
There were more than just warm words for Mr Blair, though. The whole speech could be read as a measured defence and continuation of Blairite foreign policy and the belief that Britain’s security ultimately depends on the spread of its values. Comparing this text to David Cameron’s recent Berlin address rejecting liberal interventionism and pledging to put ‘national security first’, it is clear who — in the field of foreign policy at least — is the true heir to Blair.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in