Matthew Parris Matthew Parris

The surer we are that machines can think, the less sure we’ll be about people

The march of technology is going to make the mystery of consciousness a puzzle for everyone

[Getty Images/iStockphoto] 
issue 23 August 2014

Having written (for a Times diary) a few sentences about consciousness in robots, I settled back to study readers’ responses in the online commentary section. They added little. I was claiming there had been no progress since Descartes and Berkeley in the classic philosophical debate about how we know ‘Other Minds’ exist; and that there never would be. A correspondent on the letters page referred me to Wittgenstein’s treatment of the subject and so I studied his remarks. I have to confess they are, to me, unintelligible.

But I cannot let the matter rest. My earlier thoughts had been prompted by newspaper reports of the adventures of a talking, hitchhiking Canadian robot called Hitchbot. Every time such a ‘Whatever will robots learn to do next?’ story gets a public airing, we go the rounds of the same old discussion — a discussion that started in earnest in the 20th century: the debate about whether a machine could ever be so clever and responsive that we might call it ‘conscious’ in the sense we humans think we ourselves are conscious.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in