The strangeness of Charles III

There are two narratives in Robert Hardman’s Charles III. The first is an account of the King’s first year on the throne. This is superbly researched and fascinating. We learn, for instance, that when Queen Elizabeth II died, the state trumpeters were on a plane to Canada and the bearer party was in Iraq. (Their first order on their return was to get a haircut. Their second to carry a comb.)

The second is about magic, but since Hardman doesn’t admit this explicitly, the book has the flavour of an intellectual trying to cast a spell. I don’t understand why royalists can’t just say that a monarch occupies a space to prevent something worse occupying it. Monarchism is practical, is the royalist line, considering what people are. It is republicans who are dreamers. Perhaps this isn’t interesting enough. Or perhaps it is the flip side of our British good sense. This is where we go wild, and camp.

Hardman, a newspaperman in the old style, is trusted by the royal family and is rewarded by interviews with the Princess Royal and Annabel Elliot, the Queen’s sister.